Ethical Decision Making in Health Care Term Paper

Ethical Decision Making in Health C atomic number 18 - Term radical ExampleAn example of one of these ways that can be useful in making decisions that be ethical and appropriate is the use of the deal Model. This feign of making ethical decision was established and presented by Down and his colleagues who came up with a step- by- step method of helping vocationals in making decisions that are ethical. The Down Model specifically provides professionals with ways to address challenges that affect the solving of professional enigmas ethically, since it closely resembles or relates to those rig in the medical image profession. This mannikin is made of at least six steps, which have been alter for the appropriate use by the user in responding to a number of hypotheticals. This paper will apply the Down Model to address or to respond to two particular cases by analyzing them and solving them finished the use of the six steps in the Down model. Before looking at the specific ca ses, it is insepar adequate to(p) that we look at and familiarize ourselves with the six steps of the Down Model. The first step in the model is the step that deals with assessing the problem by considering what ethical contexts are present in which the situation took place. This step requires the user to determine what kind of ethical challenge took place- ethical dilemma of justice, ethical dilemma, locus of authority unwrap or ethical distress. The second step requires the user to isolate the issues. During this point, the user must be able to differentiate the issues that are substantial to the situation from those that are not as essential. The user must in any case determine what values should be utilized. The user of the model should, at this stage, consider which ethical principles the cases or situations posit or use, they must also consider which rights an organization is violating or compromising, and which area or principle of the professions code of conduct or ethi cs covers the behavior in the situation. The third step of the model involves the user analyzing the data. It is during this stage that the user separates al the pertinent information from the pure conjecture. In this stage, the user should nevertheless examine the facts that relate to the problem and eliminate the rest. The fourth stage of the Down model involves the development of an do plan by the user. During this stage, the user makes a decision depending on what options are available for addressing the problem. The last essential stage in the model is the institution of the plan, which involves the user proceeding with the implementation of the solution. The first case that we are going to look at in this case is the first case is Case 1, which deals with the medical imaging professional. The case tells us that the executive program and the co- workers of the medical imaging professional have been suspecting that the individual has a problem controlling his drinking problem . The person in question comes to work with breath that smells of alcohol, with a compromised gait, and speech that is approximately slurred. The supervisor pulled him aside recently, as a result of these observations, and was able to confirm the signs that he had noticed earlier. The supervisor then warns the professional that according to the substance abuse policy that the observations that he has made are comme il faut to warrant for a drug tally, and requests that the imaging professional must undergo a blood test for confirmation. The imaging professional, however, refuses to do as directed. The question here is whether the way the professional acted was a way of riot or whether making him go for the test would be a violation of the rights of the